Pleonasm Examples: Redundancy as a Literary Device
A pleonasm is the use of more words than necessary to convey meaning. "Free gift," "advance warning," "end result" — each of these phrases contains a word that adds no new information because the meaning is already implied. Pleonasm comes from the Greek pleonazein, meaning "to be excessive."
In everyday speech, pleonasms are so common we barely notice them. In writing, they are usually considered errors — signs of flabby, imprecise prose. But in the hands of a skilled writer, pleonasm can be a deliberate rhetorical device: used for emphasis, rhythm, humor, characterization, or emotional intensification. The key is knowing the difference between accidental redundancy and purposeful repetition.
What Makes Something a Pleonasm?
A pleonasm occurs when one word in a phrase makes another word logically unnecessary. The test is simple: remove the suspect word and ask whether the meaning changes. If it does not, the phrase is pleonastic. "Advance planning" — remove "advance" and you still have planning, which is inherently done in advance. "Burning fire" — remove "burning" and you still have fire, which burns by nature.
This is different from other forms of repetition. An oxymoron combines contradictory terms ("bitter sweet"). A tautology says the same thing twice using different words ("it is what it is"). A pleonasm specifically uses a modifier that duplicates meaning already present in the word it modifies.
20 Common Pleonasms in Everyday Language
These phrases are so embedded in English that most people use them without thinking. Recognizing them is the first step to tighter writing — and to understanding how redundancy can be wielded deliberately.
| Pleonasm | Why It's Redundant |
|---|---|
| Free gift | A gift is by definition free. |
| Advance warning | A warning is inherently in advance. |
| Added bonus | A bonus is already something extra. |
| Close proximity | Proximity already means closeness. |
| End result | A result comes at the end. |
| Past history | History is always in the past. |
| Unexpected surprise | A surprise is unexpected by nature. |
| Basic fundamentals | Fundamentals are basic by definition. |
| Exact same | "Same" already means exact. |
| New innovation | An innovation is inherently new. |
| Completely destroy | Destruction implies completeness. |
| Foreign imports | Imports come from abroad by definition. |
| False pretense | A pretense is already false. |
| Joint collaboration | Collaboration is inherently joint. |
| Revert back | Revert already means to go back. |
| Safe haven | A haven is a safe place. |
| Sum total | A sum is a total. |
| True fact | A fact is true by definition. |
| Usual custom | A custom is a usual practice. |
| Final outcome | An outcome is final. |
Pleonasm vs. Tautology
These two terms are often confused, and even linguists disagree on the exact boundary. Here is a working distinction for writers:
Pleonasm
"Advance warning"
A modifier duplicates meaning already in the noun. One word is logically unnecessary.
Tautology
"It is what it is"
The same idea is restated using different words or structure. The whole phrase is circular.
In practice, the distinction matters less than the question: is this redundancy serving my writing, or weakening it? A pleonasm used for emphasis is rhetoric. A pleonasm used because the writer did not notice the redundancy is sloppiness.
Pleonasm in Literature
The greatest writers use pleonasm on purpose — for rhythm, emphasis, characterization, and comic effect. Here are examples that show deliberate redundancy at work.
"I saw it with my own eyes."
Common in everyday speech and dialogue
Whose eyes would you see it with? The redundancy adds emotional emphasis — the speaker is insisting on firsthand witness. In dialogue, this pleonasm sounds natural and conveys urgency.
"The most unkindest cut of all."
William Shakespeare, Julius Caesar
Shakespeare doubles the superlative — "most" and "unkindest" — creating a grammatical redundancy that amplifies the emotional weight. This is deliberate pleonasm as rhetorical intensifier.
"Let me tell you this, when social workers offer you, free, gratis and for nothing, for advice…"
Charles Dickens, Bleak House
Dickens stacks three synonyms for "free" to create comic effect. The piling on of redundant words mimics the blathering verbosity of the character speaking.
"With mine own tears I wash away my balm, / With mine own hands I give away my crown."
William Shakespeare, Richard II
"Mine own" is pleonastic — "mine" already implies ownership. But the repetition creates a ritual cadence, emphasizing Richard's agency in his own downfall.
"This was the most deadest thing I ever saw."
Mark Twain, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn
Huck's pleonastic speech ("most deadest") reveals his lack of formal education while adding folksy charm. Twain uses pleonasm as a characterization tool throughout the novel.
When Pleonasm Works as a Device
For emotional emphasis
"I saw it with my own two eyes." Technically, "my own two" is triple-redundant with "I saw." But in practice, each added word hammers the point harder. The speaker is not being wordy — they are insisting on the reality of what they witnessed. When a character is desperate to be believed, pleonasm conveys that desperation more naturally than precise, efficient language ever could.
For rhythmic effect
Poetry and oratory often need a certain number of syllables to maintain meter or cadence. Shakespeare's "the most unkindest cut" has a rhythmic weight that "the unkindest cut" lacks. The pleonasm is not a grammatical error — it is a musical choice. When writing prose with a strong rhythmic quality, a strategic pleonasm can smooth a sentence's flow or add the extra beat a passage needs.
For characterization
Real people use pleonasms constantly. Dialogue that is too clean and efficient sounds robotic. Giving characters pleonastic speech patterns — "I personally, myself, don't agree" — makes them feel human. It can also signal nervousness, bluster, or a lack of education. Mark Twain and Charles Dickens both used pleonasm in dialogue to build character voices that feel authentic and alive.
For comic effect
Deliberate over-statement is a classic comedy tool. Dickens stacking "free, gratis, and for nothing" is funny precisely because the redundancy is absurd. Monty Python, Douglas Adams, and Terry Pratchett all use pleonastic phrasing for laughs. The humor comes from the reader recognizing the excess — which means the writer must signal that the redundancy is intentional, usually through context or exaggeration.
Avoiding Accidental Pleonasm
While deliberate pleonasm can strengthen your writing, accidental pleonasm weakens it. Here are practical strategies for catching unintentional redundancy in your drafts.
Apply the deletion test
For every adjective-noun and adverb-verb pair, ask: does removing the modifier change the meaning? "She nodded her head" — what else would she nod? "He blinked his eyes" — what else would he blink? If the answer is obvious, the modifier is pleonastic. Cut it unless it serves a rhythmic or emphatic purpose.
Watch for hidden pleonasms
Some pleonasms are harder to spot because the redundancy is buried in the word's etymology. "ATM machine" (the M already stands for machine), "PIN number" (the N is number), "SAT test" (the T is test). In prose, "collaborate together," "merge together," and "return back" are common culprits. Read slowly during editing and question every modifier.
Trust your verbs
Many pleonasms come from not trusting a verb to carry the action alone. "She screamed loudly" — screaming is loud. "He whispered quietly" — whispering is quiet. "They sprinted quickly" — sprinting is fast. Choose strong verbs and let them work without adverbial scaffolding.
Tighten Your Prose, Every Day
The best way to eliminate accidental pleonasm — and master the deliberate kind — is daily practice. Hearth's distraction-free editor and streak tracking keep you writing consistently.
Start writing free